USE THE RUBRIC
Know what strong work looks like.
Reconoce cómo se ve un trabajo sólido.
Use this rubric while you work, not only after you finish. Each criterion is scored from 4 to 0. Your goal is to make choices that are clear, specific, original, respectful, and supported by evidence.
Score levels4 Mastery Work is complete, specific, thoughtful, and goes beyond the basic requirements.3 Proficient Work meets the requirements and shows clear understanding.2 Emerging Work shows a beginning understanding but needs more detail, explanation, or connection.1 Developmental Work is incomplete or difficult to follow and needs substantial support.0 Not Yet Shown The work is missing, unrelated, or does not yet show the skill.
1. Reading and Evidence
4Uses two new models accurately and explains meaningful similarities, differences, values, environment, and roles with specific evidence.
3Uses two new models and explains the main ideas with relevant evidence.
2Names the models but gives limited, general, or partly inaccurate evidence.
1Uses only one model, repeats an earlier model, or gives almost no explanation.
0Part 1 is missing or does not show reading-based thinking.
2. Story World and Values
4Designs a vivid world where the environment, survival needs, relationships, and central value clearly connect.
3Designs a believable setting and identifies a clear value or question.
2Includes some setting details or values, but the connections are weak or unclear.
1Gives very few details, or the world and value do not fit together.
0The world design is missing or unrelated to the task.
3. Creation Plan
4Plans a clear transformation with a strong beginning, creative force, creation event, challenge, consequence, meaning, and ending.
3Plans most required elements in an understandable sequence.
2Plans some elements, but the sequence or cause-and-effect needs development.
1Lists isolated ideas without a clear transformation or story movement.
0The creation plan is missing.
4. Original Creation Story
4Writes a polished, original story with strong structure, vivid details, intentional language, and a meaningful worldview.
3Writes a complete story with the required elements, clear organization, and a recognizable value or worldview.
2Writes part of a story, but it may be brief, uneven, general, or missing important elements.
1Writes an incomplete, confusing, copied, or barely developed story.
0The story is missing or unrelated to the assignment.
5. Historian Reflection and CEA
4Uses a clear claim, precise evidence from the story and models, and analysis that explains why the choices reveal values and worldview.
3Includes a clear claim, relevant evidence, and an explanation of the choices.
2Includes some CEA parts, but the evidence or analysis is general or incomplete.
1Gives a brief opinion with little evidence or explanation.
0The reflection is missing or does not address the story.
6. Responsibility, Revision, and Completion
4Shows respect for real traditions, makes the story clearly original, revises carefully, and completes every part of the Mini-Lab.
3Shows respect, completes the major parts, and makes clear revisions for accuracy and clarity.
2Completes some parts but needs more revision, care, or attention to cultural respect.
1Leaves major parts unfinished or needs significant support to revise and use the responsibility guidelines.
0Most work is missing, copied, or does not follow the responsibility guidelines.
Total: 24 points Add the six criterion scores. Use the level descriptions to decide what to improve before submitting.